Lincoln National Forest Land Management Plan Revision and Environmental Impact Statement

 

At-risk Species

What we heard from the public

Hummingbird collects pollen from a threatened species of thistle on the Lincoln National Forest

Hummingbird collects pollen from a threatened species of thistle on the Lincoln National Forest

  • The Draft LMP Revision separates fish and wildlife into three general categories: terrestrial, aquatic, and at-risk species. The latter of which includes species of conservation concern that may incorporate the Region 3 list of sensitive species. For each section, we strongly support components specific to establishing, restoring, maintaining and protecting areas necessary for providing habitat connectivity. The Draft LMP Revision does include some related components, but these could be strengthened.

  • Given the recognition that nearly 1/3 of all at-risk species on the Lincoln National Forest are threatened by grazing impacts, we hope to see the impacts of grazing to at-risk species, especially those occurring in aquatic and riparian habitats, addressed in the forest plan.

  • This section references species of conservation concern (SCC) and states that multiple uses will be carried out in a way that "ensures those species' persistence on the Forest." The discussion of SCC is lacking in several key areas. The justification subsections in the Assessment document list the threats associated with various species. Many of these threats are not substantiated with citations or scientific reasoning. New Mexico Department of Agriculture requests this information be provided.

Definitions

At-risk species are threatened and endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), proposed and candidate under ESA and SCC in the plan area.

Species of conservation concern is a Forest Service-specific classification that comes from the 2012 Planning Rule and subsequent direction in the Forest Service Handbook (FSH 1909 Chapter 12). The regulations describe an SCC as a species for which the best available science indicates there is a substantial concern about the species’ capability to persist over the long-term in the plan area. An SCC is not a federally threatened, endangered, proposed or candidate species under ESA. The Forest create an SCC list using the best available science in a proactive step intended to prevent species from becoming federally listed. As species are considered, Forest Service specialists conduct research using databases, scientific studies, local information, and expert knowledge.  Once we had an SCC list, we determined the needs of each species. We then design forest plans to guide management that sustains habitat or conditions to support or restore SCC populations to the extent we are capable of doing so. Forest plans help us maintain a forest that provides SCCs with the habitat and ecological conditions they need to survive.

Focal species are used in monitoring  to see if plan direction like desired conditions are being achieved. They may not be SCC or other protected species. Generally, more common species are used to monitor in order to determine if desired conditions for habitat are being achieved.

 

Draft Land Management Plan Component Examples

Pronghorn

Pronghorn

 

 At-Risk Species Desired Conditions

Ecological conditions (such as desired conditions for vegetation and water resources) provide habitat that contribute to the survival and recovery of federally listed, proposed, and candidate species. Meeting desired conditions would provide habitat to aid in the persistence of the species.

  1. Habitat for species of conservation concern sustains both common and uncommon native species. Habitats and refugia for species of conservation concern are intact, functioning, and sufficient for species persistence and recovery. (Refugia refers to a location that supports an isolated species population. This isolation can be due to climatic changes, natural geography, or human activities.)

  2. At-risk plant community habitats (gypseous outcrops, margins of springs and wetlands, travertine seeps, canyons, cliffs, ledges, etc.) are present, to maintain self-sustaining populations of soil-specific associated at-risk plant species.

  3. The structure and function of the vegetation and associated microclimate and special features (cavities, interlocking canopy, logs, snags, specific soil types, talus slopes, and wetlands) exist in adequate quantities within the capability of the plan area to provide habitat and refugia for at-risk species with restricted distributions.

 At-Risk Species Standards

  1. Project activities and special uses occurring within federally-designated critical habitat must integrate habitat management objectives and species protection measures from the most recent approved U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service recovery plan.

  2. Where the Forest Service has entered into signed conservation agreements that provide guidance on activities or actions to be carried out by Lincoln National Forest staff, those activities or actions must be undertaken consistent with the guidance found within those conservation agreements.

At-Risk Species Guidelines

  1. All authorized activities should be designed and implemented to address and mitigate threats to at-risk species and their habitats, including, but not limited to:

    • Timing restrictions to encourage reproductive success.

    • Prevention of introduction of invasive, competing, or predatory species (species directly and negatively impacting at-risk species populations).

    • Prevention or introduction of pathogens leading to population impacts.

    • Creation or removal of obstructions that may alter natural migration or directly cause mortality to wildlife.

    • Creation or removal of obstructions that may alter habitat function or fragment populations of plant species.

    • Avoiding or protecting small or isolated populations during management activities.

  2. Within critical habitat for threatened and endangered species, footprints of emergency ground-disturbing fire suppression activities should be as small as possible or located where ground disturbance has previously occurred.

  3. Heavy equipment should be kept out of streams during spawning, incubation, and emergence periods of aquatic at-risk species (spring to early summer for fish species) except when short-term uses are required to protect or improve resource conditions and maintain infrastructure.

  4. Means to reduce the threat to at-risk species should be implemented in areas where concentrated recreational shooting may cause harm.

  5. At-risk species habitat should be considered at the project level to identify that habitat needs are being met to retain species persistence in the planning area.

  6. Seep and spring function should be restored as necessary to maintain habitat for at-risk species (such as Sacramento Mountains thistle and Wright’s marsh thistle). 

Mexican spotted owl juvenile

Mexican spotted owl juvenile

Checkerspot butterfy

Checkerspot butterfy

 

Next Station: Water

For more information on the project or to be added to the mailing list, please contact Diane Prather at (575-649-9405) or diane.prather@usda.gov.